The Faltering Common Law Jury System (Part 3 of 3) - Page 3

Articles in this Topic Discussions in this Topic

Page 3

Apr 27, 1999

Austin, W., Walster, E., & Utne, M. (1976). Equity and the law: The effect of a harmdoer's "suffering in the act" on liking and assigned punishment. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Jury Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baron, R. A., & Bryne, D. (1997). Social Psychology (8th ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Berg, K., & Vidmar, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behaviour. Journal of Research and Personality, 9, 147-157.

DeJong, W., Morris, W., & Harstorf, A. (1976). Effect of an escaped accomplice on the punishment assigned to a criminal defendant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 192-198.

Dowdle, M., Gillen, H., & Miller, A. (1974). Integration and attribution theories as predictors of sentencing by a simulated jury. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1 (1), 270-272.

Fairchild, E. S. (1993). Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Inc.

Foley, L. A., & Chamblin, M. H. (1982). The effect of race and personality on mock jurors decisions. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 47-51.

Hart, A. J. (1995). Naturally occurring expectation effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 109-115.

Hawkins, C. (1962). Interaction rates of jurors aligned in factions. American Sociological Review, 27, 689-691.

Izzet, R., & Leginski, W. (1974). Group discussion and the influence of defendant characteristics in a simulated jury setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 271-279.

James, R. (1959). Status and competence of jurors. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 563-570.

Jurow, G .L. (1971). New data on the effect of a 'death qualified' jury on the guilt determination process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 567-611.

Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American Jury. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Landy, D., & Aronson, E. (1969). The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 141-152.

Lerner, M. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In J. Macaulay, & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Linz, D., & Pinrod, S. (1992). Exploring the first and sixth amendment: Pretrial publicity and jury decision making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W.S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21,

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4

The copyright of the article The Faltering Common Law Jury System (Part 3 of 3) - Page 3 in Forensic Psychology is owned by Michael Decaire. Permission to republish The Faltering Common Law Jury System (Part 3 of 3) - Page 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.