Suite101

Spoiled By Success


© Beth Skinner

GUEST COLUMN by Brian Goff*

Columnists sometimes exaggerate problems to generate interest. When discussing long term trends in pressing social problems, no exaggeration is needed - the figures speak for themselves. Births to unwed mothers have jumped from negligible percentages in the 1950s to one-third of all births today. More than 30 percent of children do not live with a married couple versus less than 10 percent in 1960. Crime rates per 100,000 people have more than tripled since 1960. Murder and manslaughter by juveniles and young adults have more than doubled since 1970.

The most understudied contributor to them is the explosion in living standards over the past thirty years. As a nation, we are richer than we have realized, and yet, this material success has sowed the seeds of many our most pressing social problems.

Perceptions and Reality of Living Standards

Rather than emphasize or even acknowledge an economic explosion, doomsayers on the left and (some on the) right have preached a gospel of economic stagnation. Best sellers, newspaper columnists, academics and politicians repeated standard themes: enormous gains for the rich and crumbs for the middle class and poor. Politics has played a role in this misinformation.

The 1996 Clinton, Perot, Buchanan, and Dole campaigns all utilized the stagnation message, picking and choosing facts to support their particular ends. Newt Gingrich, Richard Gephardt, and many other congressional leaders followed in their path. Also, even more honest analyses became overly reliant on a few measures of economic performance such as real GDP, real wages, and labor productivity. All of these widely used measures over-adjust for the effect of inflation because measures of inflation underaccount for improvements in the quality of products and services.

Still, the supposed economic stagnation is wrong at best, absurd at worst. Per capita real GDP has grown from $17,000 in 1970 to around $30,000 today. Real median family income jumped from less than $30,000 in 1970 to about $45,000 now. Real compensation (wages plus fringe benefits) per hour rose by 15 percent from 1970 to 1995.

Using broader based facts about expenditures, ownership and consumption not only illustrates the explosion, but also the folly of the stagnation premise. We enjoy better health, longer lives, more living space, a wider variety and a higher quality of foods, clothing and consumer goods, sophisticated electronics, faster travel and so much more. Food shares of household budgets dropped significantly after 1970 even though Americans now spend nearly half of their food budget meals outside their homes.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article Spoiled By Success in Marketplace Economics is owned by . Permission to republish Spoiled By Success in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

14.   May 26, 1999 8:39 AM
I quite like Bryan, in a perverse sort of way. And I know that he's not really any good at this sort of urination contest -- that "foil hat" joke is one he's used several times before and up to a yea ...

-- posted by JS_Mill


13.   May 26, 1999 8:36 AM
Oh, and actually, my new article in Skepticism
talks quite a bit about the increasing reaction to
Bryan's position. ...

-- posted by Prometheus


12.   May 26, 1999 8:24 AM
Mill, don't expect much from Bryan. You're just
getting into a pissing contest with a professional prick. He is paid to engage in argument and put
downs of his political opponents.

His ad-homin ...


-- posted by Prometheus


11.   May 26, 1999 6:53 AM
What on earth are you talking about? I'm almost baffled. Is this some reference to an American habit of calling black men "boy"?

If so, you're in error. The phrase "


-- posted by JS_Mill


10.   May 26, 1999 6:11 AM
Aside from the racist sentiment embedded in your vindictive drivel, I fear you really are beyond help.

I have no problem with either sex or drugs, when compared to the unpleasant solitary vice o ...


-- posted by BJohnson





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Beth Skinner's Marketplace Economics topic, please visit the Discussions page.