|
|
|
|
|
Recently, A New York family court made a father continue to pay child support after finding out that the child was not his. http://www.lawnewsnetwork.com/stories/A5... Why? It was in the child's "best interest." The child was 13 years old before the paternity test was done. The court found that this child, whom the father and the court assumed was born into the marriage, was not. However, this was the only father that the child ever knew and terminating the relationship could be detrimental to the child. All 13 years of the child's life, this person assumed the role of the child's father. This outweighed the economical considerations of the child support.
Not to say that this happens in every case, because it doesn't, the standard that is applied is fairly universal. Exactly how each state applies the "best interest standard' may be different but the basic concept is the same.
A difficult task. Just like Solomon had to decide the fate of the "real" mother in the Bible, the courts must decide which parent would be better for the child. First of all it is a difficult enough task to chose who is better and this is a task that many judges must choose often. Thus part of the reasoning for the standard. To give judges some guidance to choose the parent that will be the best for the child. So whenever there is a matter in from the court, be it a modification, a divorce, a child support enforcement hearing, visitation hearing or custody determination, the court will also take into account what is the best for the child in making its decision. Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article Understanding the ‘best interest" standard. in Divorced Parents is owned by Annelies Mouring. Permission to republish Understanding the ‘best interest" standard. in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|