Microsoft vs. Congress


© Benjamin Nham
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic


Free Guaranteed Traffic--trafficx

NEW! Check out the Microsoft News Station for constantly updated Microsoft news, articles, and discussions all over the Internet.

Last Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee was boringly titled "Market Power and Structural Change in the Software Industry." But don't be fooled. The hearing focused mostly on whether Microsoft was a monopoly or not in the most critical part of the computer (at least as sofware goes) - the operating system.

The hearing was called by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. In listening to the hearing, Hatch made it clear in his statements that he believed Microsoft was a monopoly in the software industry and that it should be regulated more closely. Among those attending the hearing were Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale, Dell CEO Michael Dell, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates, and Sun CEO Scott McNealy. Is he right? Let's look at the facts.

Microsoft owns 85 percent of the operating systems business. Windows is also preloaded onto 90 percent of computer systems.

So what does this mean? Is Microsoft a monopoly in the software business just because it owns the OS market? In one of the more dramatic scenes of the hearing, Jim Barksdale asked panel members how many members used computers with an Intel-based CPU. Half the members raised their hands. Barksdale then asked how many members used an OS made by a Microsoft competitor. No one raised their hands.

"That's a monopoly," Barksdale quipped.

Bill Gates, however, countered by telling how everyone thought IBM was a monopoly, and how Microsoft overtook it as the leader. "People who said that any start-up who tried to take on this colossus was doomed to failure. But the people who feared IBM were wrong."

In more prepared comments, Gates continued on why he thought Microsoft was not a monopoly. "Microsoft does not have monopoly power in the business of developing and licensing computer operating software. As you know, a monopolist by definition is a company that has the ability to restrict entry by new firms and unilaterally control price."

When asked by Senator Hatch whether he thought Microsoft was a monopoly, Gates cleverly dodged the question. Gates instead spoke about how other companies could easily displace Microsoft's position as the most powerful software company.

"Outside of this room and even members of this panel, you will hear how their products will replace Windows, how Java will supersede Windows, how the browser will turn into an operating system . . .You'll hear from IBM on its plans for operating systems, so there is competition." When Hatch reworded the question to try to get a better answer, Gates cleverly answered, "I'm not going to say anything about legal issues. I'm not an expert."

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

29.   May 12, 1998 6:11 PM
Time to confuse the plebs again.

Windows Explorer is part of the operating system, as managing the disks of a computer is an unseperable task of the operating system. The underlying connections to ...


-- posted by Jude


28.   May 12, 1998 2:17 PM
Technically, the browser is not part of the OS. But if you say that, than Scandisk or command.com or the Windows 95 user shell itself is not part of the OS itself.

A few weeks ago in PC Tutor in PC ...


-- posted by bnham


27.   May 12, 1998 6:13 AM
Microsoft as two companies? I'd like to be there when they draw the line

... "but office is part of the OS, it is totally intergrated, taking it out will cause the OS to fail, we need it or we hav ...


-- posted by Jude


26.   May 11, 1998 7:16 PM
Imagine: Microsoft is broken up into two companies. Likely scenarios: Apple takes advantage and sells Mac like no tomorrow. Apple wins. Two: Apple wastes time trying to figure out what to do. Three: T ...

-- posted by bnham


25.   May 11, 1998 5:41 PM
Who wouldn't like those kinds of proffits?

The thing people forget is that while software applications have high proffit margins (most software costing $400 dollars or more) OS's aren't as proffita ...


-- posted by Jude





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Benjamin Nham's Computer News topic, please visit the Discussions page.