|
|
|
|
If several weeks ago you had undertaken a long journey by tramp freighter to the African port of Luanda, hired a team of native porters and a grizzled old Dutch guide with an eye patch and a rusty elephant-gun, trudged hundreds of miles through Angola and the jungles of Zaire, located a virtually unknown village of ancient African tribesmen who had not had contact with the outside world since the days of British colonialism, and then selected a random tribesman and presented him with an NCAA tournament bracket, one thing would have been certain: that tribesman would have picked this tournament better than I have. Therefore, in this analysis of the Final Four games, you will not find any prediction of who will win. Rather than selecting incorrectly for you, I have simply analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of each team. You will need to select the incorrect team on your own.
Marquette hasn't been to the Final Four since 1977. "There is incredible excitement and enthusiasm," Marquette coach Tom Crean said. "It's great to see. But when you watch the film of Kansas, reality kind of hits you right across the head." Kansas has a ridiculously swift transition game and excels at playing the secondary break as well. The Jayhawks are averaging 82.5 points per game and shooting just under 50% from the floor. With such a highly effective transition game, the keys for Marquette will be limiting turnovers, getting back on defense, and slowing the transition game. Marquette absolutely must limit turnovers. Kansas' break is very effective off of missed baskets, so providing the Jayhawks with additional easy buckets off turnovers is a sure way to lose. With Travis Diener primarily handling the ball, Marquette has a solid point guard who makes good decisions. Pay close attention to how the Jayhawks choose to guard Diener. Should other Marquette players be forced to handle the ball more, Kansas may force a few turnovers. The second major key for Marquette is getting back on defense. Although Kansas' halfcourt offense is effective, it is nowhere near as effective as their transition offense. Its a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils. Marquette will need to drop back at least two players as quickly as possible, and at times may drop back three. Unfortunately, dropping back in this manner has a price in the form of reduced offensive rebounding. For this reason, shot selection is critical for Marquette. If you see a large number of fall-away jumpshots and covered threes taken, regardless of how many seem to be going in during any short period of the game, then the game is really just a ticking clock until Kansas' celebration.
The copyright of the article Final Four in College Basketball is owned by . Permission to republish Final Four in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|