|
|
||||||||
|
In one of the most controversial decisions handed down by a court of law in recent years, a three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled Wednesday, June 26, that the phrase "under God," contained in our nation's Pledge of Allegiance since 1954, is unconstitutional. The ruling directly impacts the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. And it has sent shockwaves throughout the legal, political, and educational communities well beyond its defined reach.
The ruling has brought swift and public denunciations from every corner of the political spectrum, Republicans and Democrats alike. The White House issued a statement immediately after the ruling, calling it "ridiculous." President George W. Bush later added, in a personal statement the following day, that the Ninth Circuit Court's decision was "out of step with the history and traditions of the country." Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) called the ruling "embarrassing." The U.S. Senate unanimously condemned it, and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-South Dakota) called on all senators to gather for the morning Pledge of Allegiance, as a show of protest, the day after the ruling. Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) threatened to introduce a constitutional amendment "if necessary" to restore the Pledge of Allegiance to our nation's classrooms, and Representative Dick Armey (R-Texas) declared that any judge that has a problem with the Pledge of Allegiance "shouldn't be on the bench." The outcry from the nation's newspapers and the public-at-large as been equally resounding. So much so that Judge Goodwin stayed his own ruling, the day after he issued it, giving the full Ninth Circuit Court time to determine whether it wishes to reconsider his decision. Public emotion does not, however, equate with valid jurisprudence. The ruling by the Ninth U.S. Circuit panel must be evaluated on its legal merits, not simply denounced on account of its controversial ramifications or its threat to societal tradition.
The copyright of the article What Would The Founders Think of The Pledge of Allegiance? in American Revolution is owned by . Permission to republish What Would The Founders Think of The Pledge of Allegiance? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Brian Tubbs's American Revolution topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||