The Civil War: Why? - Compare and Contrast


© Craig E. Hutchison

What caused the American Civil War? Much has been written on this issue and the general population has been taught and therefore tends to believe that the cause of the Civil War was slavery: the North fighting to end it and the South fighting to preserve it. The belief that is so prevalent in our society is that the North embarked on a moral campaign to free the slaves in the South. The South on the other hand relied on slaves for economic prosperity and were not about to give up slavery as a way of life. But, does this really fully explain the reason the war between the States broke out in 1861? Two books that delve into the question of the cause of the Civil War are A House Divided by Richard Sewell and The Political Crisis of the 1850s by Michael Holt. Each book approaches the question from totally different perspectives. Mr. Sewell follows the traditional approach and focuses on slavery while Mr. Holt introduces the idea that it was the collapse of the political system that eventually led to war. Each of these arguments will be dealt with in turn and it is up to the reader to decide which he or she believes is credible, perhaps it will be decided that neither is plausible.

In A House Divided, Mr. Sewell focuses attention on slavery as the main cause of why the sections of the country, North and South, became polarized, eventually leading to war. The author looks at sectional discord in the years after 1848 when a number of compromises had to be worked out over the extension of slavery into the territories. There came a time when the North and South were unable to find common ground, and according to Mr. Sewell, the Union finally broke asunder.

The author claims that the main division between North and South began to take place during the Mexican War over questions of slavery's expansion. He remarks that "so momentous was the question of slavery's expansion that proposals for its resolution sprouted almost as soon as the conflict with Mexico began". David Wilmot, a democrat from Pennsylvania, introduced a provision in Congress that slavery be excluded from any territory acquired from Mexico. White Southerners saw this as a challenge to the slave system everywhere.

Mr. Sewell points out that solution after solution was proposed to settle the controversy of slavery's expansion. Southerners were vehemently opposed to any territorial bill that denied them equal rights, including the right to hold slave property. The Missouri Compromise of 1850, which at one time many thought had ended the debate on slavery, was repealed and replaced with popular sovereignty by the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska bill. This bill allowed the people to decide whether to allow slavery in the territory in which they lived. This created a "hell of a storm" throughout the North according to Stephen Douglas. To prove that sectionalism was heating up, Mr. Sewell gives statistics on the Kansas-Nebraska bill that shows nearly 90 percent of all Southerners voted for it while 64 percent of the Northern representatives cast ballots against it. Throughout the 1850's the North and South grew farther apart on one main issue, slavery. Then in October 1859, John Brown's raid left the South "feeling isolated, besieged, dishonored, and physically imperiled as never before". Many in the South believed that the North would resort to force, just like Brown, in order to stop slavery. Mr. Sewell goes on to say that the "chief effect of John Brown's foray was, of course, to strengthen the hand of the fiery advocates of secession". When Abraham Lincoln, a Republican dedicated to the idea that slavery was evil and should be dealt with as such, was elected President, the deep South felt there was no way out but separation. The South saw Lincoln's election and the appointments he would make to positions in the South as being able to foster an antislavery influence dangerous not only to their peculiar institution but to the very lives of Southern whites. With this in mind, seven states in the deep South seceded from the Union. The upper South chose to take a wait and see attitude, but when President Lincoln tried to reprovision Fort Sumter, it was fired upon from Charleston harbor. This act provoked President Lincoln to ask for 75,000 volunteers and four more states joined the Confederacy: the bloodiest war in American history had begun.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article The Civil War: Why? - Compare and Contrast in U.S. Civil War 1856-62 is owned by . Permission to republish The Civil War: Why? - Compare and Contrast in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo