|
|||
|
Page 2
The Liberals themselves will crown their new leader during a leadership conference in the latter part of the year. While it is all but certain that Paul Martin will assume the mantelpiece of governance, be it also resolved for the Liberals to at least field a slate of candidates willing to crack open the policy coffers and spell out a concrete vision Mr. Martin can follow.
For that matter, this year may as well even be considered a first year for the Canadian Alliance's Stephen Harper, given his near disappearance from the political scene following his leadership win and subsequent by-election victory. Be it resolved that Stephen Harper will show up this year to participate in the democratic process. With fresh captains at the helms of the political ships, 2003 ought to make for a year when fresh discussion of the country's course is at the forefront of political news. Which brings me to my next resolution. This year all political parties resolve to provide clear, concise, measurable, objective plans they have for the country. Let this be a year when all of the political parties stand on principle rather than polling data. Political parties ought to listen to what the electorate is saying, to be sure. On the other hand, how much better informed might the public be if parties laid out an articulate, understandable platform that provides Canadians with a clear choice? Be it resolved, therefore, that all of the following ambiguous, empty, sound-bite concocted phrases be struck from the political lexicon: "We're planning to look to the future." Is there really any other way? "We want to address issues important to Canadians." So do we. Please tell us what yours are and we'll let you know if they match ours. "We all need to work together." Doing what, exactly? "We will continue to invest in the priorities of Canadians: Health care, infrastructure, the environment, children and families" (from Chretien's holiday message - http://pm.gc.ca/ ). Hmmm. That sounds familiar. Be it also resolved to avoid creating 'scandals' in public office. This goes as much for the opposition parties as it does for the governing Liberals. Of course this involves having government operate in as transparent and responsible manner as possible. For that, the Liberals will need to focus on their own behaviour within and without the House and their contractual relationships with corporations with ties to the party. The Tories, Alliance, NDP and Bloc also must do their part. Before leveling a charge of misconduct or conflict of interest, let's be darned certain it's true, it's relevant and it is more than smear politics.
The copyright of the article Political Resolutions
- Page 2 in Canadian Federal Politics is owned by . Permission to republish Political Resolutions
- Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to David Russell's Canadian Federal Politics topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||