2004 - the political year that was


© David Russell
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

Given the events of the final week of 2004 discussion of Paul Martin's premier annis prime ministeris seems trite and wholly insignificant. But it is the time of year for reflection - political reflection for this column - and for all the many faults we may have found with our government and politicians, the tragedy in Southeast Asia at least helps to put our foibles in perspective.

Thus, in what is quickly becoming an annual tradition (okay, it's only the second year but traditions do take awhile to take hold) here are my Top Ten Canadian political stories of the year.

10/1. The Sponsorship Scandal

It's difficult to know just whether to put this at the top or bottom of the list so it's going to go at either end. That's right - it's arguably the single most significant issue in the federal government that has already, for the most part, fallen out of the media's viewfinder and its importance warrants double entry on the 2004 list.

2004 marked the first full year of Canada being governed by the man who would be king - or at least had been planning his ascension to 24 Sussex since at least 1993. Ten years in the making, one would expect great things to come from the new regime.

What a let down.

An old rhetorical joke asks: "What is Martinizing and why does it take one hour?" The political parallel could ask the same question, only replacing one hour with one year. To carry the lame metaphor to its obvious conclusion, one of the key promises the new Prime Minister made was along the lines of 'cleaning up Ottawa.' In other words, a 2004 resolution would have involved making sure that dollars were spent where they ought to be spent instead of being frittered away on the latest government whim of the day.

Like most resolutions, this one made it about as far as February, when Auditor General Sheila Fraser unleashed her scathing report on the state of government finances, particularly the truckloads of unaccounted-for money unloaded through the federal government's sponsorship program [http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/cana... ] . The report, among other things, highlighted not only that vast quantities of tax dollars were being spent to promote Canadian federalism to Quebec nationalists, but also that very few controls were in place to ensure that value for dollar was achieved or even that dollars went where they were supposed to go.

     

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo