Women in Buddhism
Jul 1, 2001 -
© Yeshe Chodon
This idea is echoed in another outstanding example of scholarship, an article at http://www.enabling.org/ia/vipassana/Arc... called The Place of Women in Buddhism by Swarna de Silva. De Silva begins with the sutras which define the position of women as completely subject to men in early Hindu society:
The position of women under Hinduism is well-known:But, de Silva goes on to say, Buddha introduced more liberal--liberal for that day--thought on the question. This came about not so much as a quest for social justice, but more because gender in itself has no place as a concept in a belief system which posits the unreality of the temporal self.
Later academic speculation has raised the question whether a female could become a Buddha or a Bodhisattva. Mahayanists have taken an affirmative position (e.g. the cult of Kwan Yin as a Bodihisattva who heeds the pleas of those in distress), but the Theravadan position is less clear. Some have claimed that the Buddhas have to be males, others have taken a more ambiguous position. The correct way to approach this question is to regard it as another of those profitless questions which the Buddha left unresolved (avyâkata), as it is irrelevant to the question of release from samsâra. There can be only one Buddha in a given Buddha-era (despite what some of the Jâtakas may imply), and the present era happened to have been inaugurated whether by necessity or coincidence, by a male, Siddhatta Gotama. |