The modernist movement, which included such literary luminaries as Virginia Woolf, Katherine Mansfield, Ford Maddox Ford, and James Joyce, was significantly influenced by the horrors of World War I, which stripped Europe of the majority of its male population. Against this surreal backdrop of war atrocities, a scarred populace fumbled with its grasp of reality. What was substantial? Reliable? Important? Modern art and literature tested traditional notions of a static reality. In art, for example, pointillist dots and flecks blurred to suggest images rather than to clearly delineate forms or substance. Disabused of his idealized Congo, Conrad likewise shifts the sands beneath our feet.
We learn about reality through the various and often second hand accounts of others. Hence, which account is “real?” Furthermore, our faithful narrator may not be faithful after all. Marlow recounts his trip to Africa to four passengers on a boat sailing down the Thames. One passenger comments:
The yarns of seamen have a direct simplicity, the whole meaning of which lies within the shell of a cracked nut. But Marlow was not typical (if his propensity to spin yarns be excepted), and to him the meaning of an episode was not inside like a kernel but outside, enveloping the tale which brought it out only as a glow brings out a haze, in the likeness of one of these misty halos that sometimes are made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine.
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Pamela St. Clair's British Literature topic, please visit the Discussions page.