The War Fought Over "A Scrap of Paper:" England And The Outbreak Of WWI


© Joseph Sramek

On August 3, 1914, the British Foreign Secretary's, Sir Edward Grey, worst fears became realized. In less than a week, the carefully constructed old order of even alliances, which the British helped to create and which had prevented war from breaking out earlier, came crashing down. As he stood from his London office, he said to his assistant the now famous words: "The lamps are now going out all over Europe. We shall not see them lit again in our lifetime." (1) These words are seen today as being very prophetic; the war sucked the life, the vitality of Edwardian Europe, and changed Europe forever.

That evening at 11 p.m. England declared war on Germany, obstensibly to defend Belgian neutrality or, as the Germans put it, to defend merely "a scrap of paper." (2) What had been another Balkan crisis, had become a world war. Why??

The existance of many books, such as James Joll's landmark The Origins of the First World War demonstrates the immense difficulty, if not impossibility of answering this question. The framers of Versailles tried to pin the blame entirely on Germany's "blank check," to equal failure. Attempting to blame this or that country entirely for the mess has become risky, to say the least.

But why did Britain and the British Empire enter the war in August 1914?? Essentially, because it was forced to. Not by any formal alliance; there was none-- The Entente Cordiale (1904) made with France and the 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention were merely treaties of understanding, and applied only to the colonial world. Britain was perfectly free to be neutral in any European war, a point made by the two Liberal Cabinet Ministers who resigned when war was declared. In fact, had Germany not invaded Belgium, the Liberal Government would have had enormous difficulty bringing Britain into the war.

What clinched it, then, was the German invasion of Belgium. This action violated a treaty of neutrality signed in 1839 which was signed by all the major European powers, including then-Prussia. This was "the scrap of paper," that Kaiser Wilhelm II talked about. He should have known that traditional British foreign policy required a Belgium uncontrolled by any major Continental power, as Belgium was seen as the pistol/daggar at the heart of England.

This first argument would have won over the policy experts, but would not have really made headway with the general public. However, the invasion of a small, helpless, independent, nation (Belgium) by its larger neighbor (Germany) convinced many naysayers that war was justified. What was a war over "a scrap of paper" to the Germans became a war over the rights of small nations against tyranny to many ordinary Britons. A few anti-war activists staged a massive protest in Trafalgar Square on August 2, 1914, but this ended in disorder, with the protesters being shouted down. (3) British soldiers signed up in record numbers. The war fever that had permeated the Continent only a few days or a week before had also affected the traditional British reserve!

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article The War Fought Over "A Scrap of Paper:" England And The Outbreak Of WWI in Modern British History is owned by . Permission to republish The War Fought Over "A Scrap of Paper:" England And The Outbreak Of WWI in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

7.   Dec 2, 1998 11:54 PM
My understanding of WWI is that without Britian, the Germans would have won the war. And how would the US have entered if the Germans were not conducting unrestricted submarine warfare- which they w ...

-- posted by not_him_again


6.   Nov 22, 1998 1:31 PM
The traditional view that Germany provoked the war by rampant navalism, and that there was little that Britain could have done once the invasion of Belgium was underway without losing credibility as a ...

-- posted by Mike1


5.   Jun 24, 1998 4:51 PM
Well perhaps, but during that time period, Britain was certainly the chief arbiter in Europe. Nothing could be done to upset the balance of power without Britain's knowledge and consent of it. And t ...

-- posted by Joe_Sramek


4.   Jun 24, 1998 9:09 AM
I disagree that Britain has ever been the dominant power in Europe (maybe except during the Hundred Years' War...) The term "dominant power" implies it could act unilaterally on the continent. Brita ...

-- posted by pseudoerasmus


3.   Jun 23, 1998 7:18 PM
Not only is it an old story, but one that was played by Britain herself in the 19th Century. From 1815 until 1871, with the brief exception of the Crimean War, Britain was the dominant power in Europ ...

-- posted by Joe_Sramek





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Joseph Sramek's Modern British History topic, please visit the Discussions page.