Suite101

Margaret Thatcher's Revolution of 1979? (book review) - Page 4


© Joseph Sramek
Page 4
Nevertheless, when assessing these four very incomplete, tentative analyses, I found Peter Jenkins to be the most convincing and Hugo Young to be the weakest. While Jenkins presents a clear, cogently argued thesis that largely seems to be correct from the vantage-point of 1999, Young contradicts himself completely. While Thatcher is to be credited with causing much fundamental change in British society, these changes were undermined by her successors. This statement is non-sensical; how can something be a fundamental change if it is not upheld by a succeeding administration? Likewise Biddess’ assertion that Thatcher "won" the 1983 general election on her ideas and policies, but that this should not be construed as a victory for "Thatcherism" seems equally as absurd. Finally, while Harris is quite consistent in his almost hagiographic account of Thatcher, his seeming failure to critique her on any fundamental level was quite disappointing.

In closing, I would finally say that I suspect that these faults will be remedied by a new generation of scholars in a couple of decades, when the archives open up and the Labour Government of Tony Blair is as much recent history as the Thatcher Government is to us nowadays. There just is not enough proper distance yet to properly determine Thatcher’s role in the "revolution of 1979."

Footnotes:

[1] Kenneth Harris, Thatcher, (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988), p. 216.

[2] Hugo Young, One of Us: A Biography of Margaret Thatcher, (London: Macmillan, 1991), p. 624.

[3] Kenneth Minogue and Michael Biddess, eds., Thatcherism: Personality and Politics, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987), p. 6.

[4] Ibid., p. 11.

[5] Peter Clarke, Hope and Glory, (New York: Penguin, 1997), pp. 408-10.

[6] Minogue, p. 11.

[7] Harris, p. 2.

[8] Ibid., p. 4.

[9] Ibid., p. 3.

[10] Ibid., p. 110.

[11] Ibid., p. 121.

[12] Ibid., p. 214.

[13] Ibid., pp. 215-6.

[14] Young, pp. 598-9.

[15] Ibid., pp. 621-2.

[16] Ibid., p. 506.

[17] The Winter of Discontent took place in 1978-1979, when several strikes, all relatively minor but annoying to the populace, such as one involving garbage collection, helped to bring down the James Callaghan Labour Government and forced early elections which Thatcher and her Conservative Party won.

[18] Peter Jenkins, Mrs. Thatcher’s Revolution: The Ending of the Socialist Era, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988), p. 28.

[19] Ibid., p. 89.

[20] Ibid., p. 166.

[21] Ibid., p. 335.

[22] Ibid.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article Margaret Thatcher's Revolution of 1979? (book review) - Page 4 in Modern British History is owned by . Permission to republish Margaret Thatcher's Revolution of 1979? (book review) - Page 4 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

1.   Feb 5, 2001 12:32 AM
Hi Joseph,
I know a lot of people who believe that Margaret Thatcher's rule came to an end when she introduced the 'Poll Tax?' I know it didn't help her career at all, but she was a strong ...

-- posted by thebattwoman





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Joseph Sramek's Modern British History topic, please visit the Discussions page.