The Labour Party and the Spanish Civil War, Part I - Page 3


© Joseph Sramek
Page 3
Two months later he attacked the entire basis on which the National Government's foriegn policy had been based:

    You have states [i.e. Germany and Italy] which entirely disregard obligations. They tear up treaties that are made, and they carry on making a new treaty while breaking another. We [the Labour Party] feel that it is very little use to have signatures unless signatures are to be honoured. [17]

He also criticized the Foreign Secretary [Anthony Eden], saying:

    There was a remarkable cartoon the other day of the right hon. Gentleman as an autograph hunter going with a book before these dictators and getting signatures. It was a bitter cartoon and contained a good deal of truth. [18]

    By March 1937, there were 110,000 "foreign volunteers" inside Spain, mainly Italian and German. [19] Mussolini openly boasted about his "volunteers," yet the British Government attempted to maintain the fiction of non-intervention. Again they did not want to contemplate decisive action for fear of war.

    To this Attlee replied that he did not believe in "throwing sops to Dictators." [20] He ended his speech with a stark warning, saying: "We [the Labour Party] believe in democracy, but if democracy is to survive it must be prepared to stand up to the dictators." [21]

    Footnotes:

    [1] Kenneth Millen-Penn, "From Liberal to Socialist Internationalism: Konni Zilliacus and the League of Nations, 1894-1939, Ph.D. Dissertation, (Binghamton, NY: Binghamton University, 1993), p. 545.

    [2] John F. Naylor, Labour's International Policy: Labour in the 1930s, (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969), p. 138.

    [3] Kenneth Harris, Attlee, (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1982), p. 127.

    [4] Naylor, p. 143.

    [5] Ibid., p. 144, quoting Labour Party Annual Conference Report, 1936, p. 29.

    [6] Ibid., p. 162.

    [7] At Labour Party Conferences, delegates from affiliated organizations [Trade Unions, constituency parties, auxiliary groups,e tc.] cast votes equal to their total national memberships.

    [8] At this time, there was an Embargo on the sale of arms to either side of the conflict. Franco and his Nationalists still got their arms, albeit covertly from Italy and Germany. The Loyalists did not receive as much arms, and thus, were at a distinct disadvantage.

    [9] Naylor, pp. 163-64, quoting Labour Party Annual Conference Report, 1936, p. 213.

    [10] Ibid.

    [11] Ibid., quoting Labour Party Annual Conference Report, 1936, p. 215.

    [12] Ibid., pp. 164-65.

    [13] House of Commons Debates, vol. 316, [316 H. C. Debs.], 29 October 1936, col. 136.

    [14] Ibid., col. 140.

    [15] Ibid.

    [16] Ibid.

    [17] 319 H.C. Debs., 19 January 1937, col. 109.

    [18] Ibid.

    [19] Charles Loch Mowat, Britain Between the Wars, 1918-1940, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1955), p. 573.

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4


The copyright of the article The Labour Party and the Spanish Civil War, Part I - Page 3 in Modern British History is owned by . Permission to republish The Labour Party and the Spanish Civil War, Part I - Page 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Nov 12, 1998 11:58 AM
Okay, I'll take those choices. I wish I could get out there to visit. I've read so much about her home. Those five buttons are challenging. I had a hard time getting enough answers in my poll too. ...

-- posted by Terrie_Bittner


2.   Nov 11, 1998 9:10 PM
I agree with your choice of Eleanor! The trouble is that there are only 5 possible buttons on our polls, which IMHO, needs to be changed! In any event, I would make a compromise vote: Winston Churc ...

-- posted by Joe_Sramek


1.   Nov 8, 1998 2:59 PM
I voted for Other in your poll, because my personal choice would be Eleanor Roosevelt, my personal hero. (I am after all the women's history editor!) Most of the social programs he gets credit for are ...

-- posted by Terrie_Bittner





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Joseph Sramek's Modern British History topic, please visit the Discussions page.