|
|||
|
Last week we discussed the reasoning behind Periodization. The S.A.I.D. principle dictates that our bodies will handle workloads and overcompensate - as long as we're pushing ourselves a little bit over the previous max. But if we keep doing the same thing over and over again, our bodies quickly learn to anticipate our next move. The body prefers not to be forced to change shape, so it'll use this to its advantage - as in being prepared. The cliche of "Keep'em guessing to grow!" is actually 100% accurate!
The trick for breaking out of a plateau is to add another dimension. That means, stimulating the muscle in another way, yet maintaining intensity! Now, bear with me for a second. So, if you do 3 sets / 4 reps with a heavy weight, can we agree on that we end up with roughly the same intensity when we do 3 sets / 12 reps, with a lighter weight but cutting the rest-time in half? But what's the nature of the work? Is it the explosive fast-twitch fibers taking the hit, or the elsewise spared slow-twitch? Ok, now raise a hand, everyone who still insists that always doing heavy training is the best way to build muscle. For the rest of you, it's time to get down to business. Step one is to drop the fancy names and labels on things you might stumble over if you read a book or an article about this. Step two is to draw a simple chart for, say the next 12 months. Mark up 52 weeks and use these simple measures. Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article Periodization 101 (part 2 of 2) in Weight Training is owned by . Permission to republish Periodization 101 (part 2 of 2) in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Matt Danielson's Weight Training topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||