Periodization 101 (part 2 of 2)


© Matt Danielson
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

Last week we discussed the reasoning behind Periodization. The S.A.I.D. principle dictates that our bodies will handle workloads and overcompensate - as long as we're pushing ourselves a little bit over the previous max. But if we keep doing the same thing over and over again, our bodies quickly learn to anticipate our next move. The body prefers not to be forced to change shape, so it'll use this to its advantage - as in being prepared. The cliche of "Keep'em guessing to grow!" is actually 100% accurate!

The trick for breaking out of a plateau is to add another dimension. That means, stimulating the muscle in another way, yet maintaining intensity! Now, bear with me for a second.
Intensity = actual stress on a muscle.
The intensity, or the stress also depends on the time factor. How is it to do 3 sets / 10 reps of squats with 30 seconds break in between sets - as opposed to doing the SAME amount of sets with the SAME amount of weight, when you're resting 5 min between the sets? It's not even the same ballgame! And why is this? Well, to put it simple: With the shorter rest, you got yourself a higher intensity.

So, if you do 3 sets / 4 reps with a heavy weight, can we agree on that we end up with roughly the same intensity when we do 3 sets / 12 reps, with a lighter weight but cutting the rest-time in half? But what's the nature of the work? Is it the explosive fast-twitch fibers taking the hit, or the elsewise spared slow-twitch?
Rhetoric questions. Boring. So let's get to the point: While maintaining intensity, we're able to not only shock the body with something it's not used to - we also allow the often-overworked fast-twitch fibers to REST, while putting the under-stimulated slow-twich fibers at WORK. The reason for this being a nice bonus is that if a muscle contained 40% slow-twitch fibers, that means that 40% of that muscle has not recieved maximum stimulation before! Go ahead, roll up your sleeve and have a look. Think about what those percents could do for you.

Ok, now raise a hand, everyone who still insists that always doing heavy training is the best way to build muscle.

For the rest of you, it's time to get down to business. Step one is to drop the fancy names and labels on things you might stumble over if you read a book or an article about this. Step two is to draw a simple chart for, say the next 12 months. Mark up 52 weeks and use these simple measures.

Go To Page: 1 2


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

2.   Jun 29, 1999 1:28 PM
Sure, looks like an Ok split to me - even though I would train Chest/Triceps on the same day and Back/Biceps on another day, as you wouldn't run the risk of having your training impaired by a sore "he ...

-- posted by MattD_2


1.   Jun 29, 1999 7:24 AM
Will the program below make me loss fat while maintaining muscle mass?. Will this overtrain me or is this not enough?.

Mon chest & back
Tue biceps,triceps,forearms and 45 min cardio
Wed res ...


-- posted by nonoy





Join the latest discussions

For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Matt Danielson's Weight Training topic, please visit the Discussions page.