102 Dalmatians
Jan 16, 2001 -
© James C. Hess
I swear, one of these days, I'm going to do it. If Hollywood keeps on its current path, one of these days I am going to do it: I am going to sit down and compile a volume of all the films and movies Hollywood has remade and remade, with the title of this tome being: "The Twice-Chewed Meal". Doing so, of course, will reveal an ugly truth Hollywood does not want you to know: Of the thousands and thousands of films and movies Hollywood has made, maybe a hundred are original efforts. For as long as I can recall Hollywood has held the wrong-headed belief that if a film or movie succeeds once, twice is better. Which goes to explain why "102 Dalmatians" was made. When "101 Dalmatians" was made as an animated film it was a success across the board. So it was justifiable to a point that it could be remade as a live-action effort. That film proved equally successful. Which meant, for reasons perverted, a sequel was certain. And here it is: "102 Dalmatians". Disney knows that people who go see Walt Disney movies want simplicity, so simplicity here: Cruella De Vil (Glenn Close) has been released on probation after previously being convicted and jailed for dognapping. She is assigned to a parole office named Chloe (Alice Evans), who loves Dalmatians, who does not believe for a moment Cruella has changed--reformed. But. . . superficially she seems otherwise: She gets involved in the activities of a shelter for homeless animals, run by a fellow named Kevin (Ioan Gruffudd), who is rather fond of Chloe. Then something happens: Big Ben chimes and Cruella returns to her former self. Yes, this premise is original and different from the first movie, but it is, at its most basic, a twice-chewed meal. We know Cruella. We know that she will attempt to profit from the dogs. We know she will be caught. Regardless--and this may go to explain much as to why moviegoers are so willing to see remakes--"102 Dalmatians" is worth the ticket price. Cruella is, and will remain, a sinful delight with her bigger-than-life self and her self-serving excess, from her home, with (dog) fur-storage rooms and dungeons, hidden doors, and traps, to her hair--half black, half white, to her nails and sadistic clownish makeup. I wondered, watching this movie, if the creators went back not to the first movie, but the original, and studied it to determine how to do this one. I think so. There is a certain energy here that is usually reserved for animated efforts.
The copyright of the article 102 Dalmatians
in Film & TV Reviews is owned by James C. Hess
. Permission to republish 102 Dalmatians
in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Go To Page: 1 2 Articles in this Topic Discussions in this Topic |