Gladiator


© James C. Hess

If you want to see an example of how closely tied Hollywood and Washington D.C. (specifically the Clinton Adminstration) are, look no further than "Gladiator".

For almost eight years Bill Clinton has attempted (unsuccessfully, thankfully) to build a legacy by co-opting efforts from previous presidents: From Ronald Reagan this, from Richard M. Nixon that. From Thomas Jefferson that, from FDR this.

Ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

Now comes "Gladiator" (which Al Gore praises and Clinton loves), and the exact same thing: From "Ben-Hur" this, from "Spartacus" that. From "Rocky" this, from "Quo Vadis" that.

Ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

There are numerous problems with "Gladiator", with the most apparent possibly being the film looks like it was printed down, out of focus: Muddy, fuzzy, annoyingly soft and indistinctive.

The colors seem to want to suggest Gordon Willis' work in "The Godfather" trilogy, but come across as a very watered-down version or half-handed homage of same; there seems to be a purposeful intent to have shot on overcast days.

Which may, in some demented way by of the efforts from director Ridley Scott, go to present the characters--bitter, depressive, vengful, petty--and to hide the obviousness of the special effects.

The story line of "Gladiator" smacks of "Rocky" (the original, only): The hero of the story, a general from Spain named Maximus (Russell Crowe), is a favorite of the dying emperor, Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris).

Why is he held in such high regard? He defeats the barbarians. So Marcus names him protector of Rome.

But he is left for dead by Marcus' son, his rival, Commodus.

Huh? Don't ask.

Maximus survives and escapes Commodus' tyranny. But finds his wife and son have been murdered.

Maximus makes his way to the deserts of North Africa, where he is sold as a slave to Proximo (Oliver Reed, who died while the film was being made), a manager of gladiators.

Now this seems odd, but wait. Here's the logic: Commodus, now ruler, lifts his late father's ban on gladiators in Rome so as to distract the people from hunger and disease.

(Who does that sound like? If you said 'Clinton', well, your days are numbered, because no one says bad things about him, The Great White Father, that he be.)

Because the ban is lifted Maximus returns to Rome, and fights his way to the top of the gladiator heap, and, well, that's the end of the movie.

This plot, this premise, this story could have been good, rousing, macho entertainment. It was. As "Ben-Hur". As "Spartacus". Here it comes across as utter nonsense, heaped over with overlywrought melodramatics and very bad acting.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Gladiator in Film & TV Reviews is owned by . Permission to republish Gladiator in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

7.   Mar 23, 2001 8:19 AM
In response to message posted by emtorres79:

You came to a good place. What can I help you find? ...


-- posted by james_hess


6.   Mar 22, 2001 12:16 PM
How are yuo been
Im here in the university and i need infromation of gladiator

-- posted by emtorres79


5.   Oct 14, 2000 8:09 AM
Since I don't have many readers you're never late. And thank you for taking time to read and respond. In response to your comments "Ben Hur vs. Gladiator", your points are valid.

Again, thank you f ...


-- posted by james_hess


4.   Oct 14, 2000 2:07 AM
I hope this isn't a bit too late, but I'm new to Suite 101.

I see Ben Hur and Gladiator both as theatrical drama films, but each has a different perspective. The drama films of more recent times ...


-- posted by foxshadow


3.   Jun 17, 2000 5:07 PM
RE: Did I or did I not see the movie? Yes. I did. And I wrote "he defeated the barbarians". That was all. Whatever you choose to read into what I wrote is up to you. As to the movie, I would rather go ...

-- posted by james_hess





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to James C. Hess's Film & TV Reviews topic, please visit the Discussions page.