The problem with secular humanism


© Francois Tremblay

Atheism does not present an easy target for disapprobation. A christian, to be called such, necessarily believes in a certain number of assumptions, scriptures and rules which constrain his behaviour and reasoning, even if only as simple as "God exists". Most theists identify themselves with a religion, and therefore present an easily-refutable block of propositions or concepts.

"Atheism", on the other hand, is a general term. Most atheists do not identify themselves with a particular ideology. Their only common attribute, then, is a lack of belief in gods. Little wonder that atheist groups are so dispersed. Regrouping on the basis of a religion is already a dicey proposition, let alone on a relatively insignificant position as a lack of belief in a particular concept.

Religious lobbies who need a straw man to pin on the atheist mostly use secular humanism for target practice. Its supposed immorality and general impiety makes it a suspect of everything that is wrong with society - some have even proposed that it is a conspiracy. As with anything with religion, however, this outlook is very limited.

Humanism is a general term that designates a gradient of ideologies. There is religious as well as secular humanism, but both share basic principles. Christian and religious humanism seek the fulfillment of man within a religious context. This human-oriented faith, of course, is not biblical - as religious doctrines demand divine obedience above all. As such, religious humanism is a feel-good, pick-and-choose vague idea of what religion should really be like, an ideology that supports human fulfillment.

Secular humanism, on the other hand, is based on the rejection of supernaturalism, and the adoption of science, democracy, and "human compassion" (Frederick Edwords, "What is humanism ?"). In the same way, it is a feel-good, pick-and-choose vague idea of what reality should be like.



Certainly there is a lot of merit in the basic idea of humanism. Human beings are not perfect, epistemically or otherwise, and we cannot rely on divine intervention or revelation to find knowledge. Therefore a rational, human-based approach to reality is desirable. In the same manner, focusing the validation of our actions on human reason and context rather than inhuman religious doctrine, and our society on the fulfillment of human life rather than submission to the clergy or religious principles, are good ideas.

Unfortunately, secular humanism only takes these ideas so far. Granted, it is a pretty vague ideology in the first place. However, what is established about it is enough to determine that it is not a proper basis for man's life.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article The problem with secular humanism in Atheism is owned by . Permission to republish The problem with secular humanism in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

4.   Dec 12, 2001 10:29 AM
Thank you for addressing this article Pioneer70. BTW I never said it was a complete examination of secular humanism, but rather an overview. I'm sorry if it was misleading in some way.


""It propo ...


-- posted by Franc28


3.   Dec 12, 2001 8:49 AM
In response to message posted by Franc28:

The problems in this article are legion. For a brief overview:

"The Humanist Manifesto, de ...


-- posted by Pioneer70


2.   Oct 1, 2001 10:12 AM
In response to message posted by jro:

Actually, I have read humanist opinions and thought outside of the Manifesto before. I think thes ...


-- posted by Franc28


1.   Oct 1, 2001 10:08 AM
Dear editor,

Hi! I liked your article on Secular Humanism, but I think you could improve it by adding more opinions to the debate. You could say, for example, wether there were humanist thinkers wh ...


-- posted by jro





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Francois Tremblay's Atheism topic, please visit the Discussions page.