Christian Crusade for Catatonia


© Joseph Newhard

Justice was two-fold in Florida last month: Terri Schiavo was finally permitted to die, and the Christian right received a much-needed lesson in the separation of powers, federalism, and God's indifference or impotence (which is worse?) towards human suffering.

Schiavo's fight against her persistent vegetative state, resulting from brain damage suffered in 1990, finally came to an end on Thursday, March 31, 2005. Her state of infirmity was prolonged thanks to the misguided activism of the religious right and their seven-year legal battle, determined to keep her alive by artificial means despite the wishes of the husband, who according to law is typically considered the fiercest defender of her best interests.

Since time memorable the philosophers have been concerned with discovering the "life worth living." As far as I know, it is only the curious philosophy of Christianity that has led its followers to conclude that such a life includes experiencing the destruction of one's brain material down to the brain stem, rendering one's capacity for rational thought and meaningful experience totally dissolved. This is especially puzzling given the Christian belief that she will regain conscious awareness once mankind stops meddling with her body and allows her to succumb to the death God willed her to experience.

The religious right, or who I prefer to call the "religious wrong," are keen at telling everyone God's opinion on every subject from euthanasia to abortion, from God's contempt for pleasure of any kind to his implied approval of polyester pants. God has so many liaisons on Earth informing mankind of his stances that he has apparently been overwhelmed with confusion in his appointments, as a great deal of these representatives are adept at giving us conflicting reports of his passions and displeasures.

Religious belief, which is nothing more than self-delusion on a grand scale, a collective mental illness deserving inclusion in the DSM-IV, is responsible for the inane approach to life held by the religious defenders of Terri Schiavo's forced life extension. Christians have for 2000 years made it their business to tell people how to live their lives, and readily assaulted them with physical force when necessary. Is shouldn't surprise anyone with a modest exposure to history that the proper functioning of the separation of church and state has induced them to clench their fists and stomp up and down like children just because the courts didn't decide their way.




For added irony, these same people who are allegedly "defending life" are the ones who would deny individuals the right to end their lives with assistance from a professional when they deem their lives no longer worth living. Schiavo didn't have to starve to death, but the same people bombarding us with emotional arguments of the pain and suffering of her death are the first to refuse someone the right to a lethal injection that would swiftly spring their suffering and merely hasten the inevitable.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Christian Crusade for Catatonia in Atheism is owned by Joseph Newhard. Permission to republish Christian Crusade for Catatonia in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

20.   Nov 26, 2005 9:35 PM
In response to Re: Re: Message posted by Craig93:

We really shouldn't be mean to the Christians... it's like teasing a retarded child ...


-- posted by nogod4me


19.   Apr 28, 2005 6:22 AM
In response to Re: Re: Message posted by Craig93:

"I am guilty of [tearing [others] down for their beliefs[ from time to time."


-- posted by Pinky102


18.   Apr 28, 2005 5:02 AM
In response to Re: Message posted by atheist101:

G'day Atheist101.

Your reply above is one of the best posts in this topic I h ...


-- posted by Craig93


17.   Apr 28, 2005 3:01 AM
In response to Message posted by Craig93:

“I'm not any the more clearer about what Atheism is all about, apart from tearing others do ...


-- posted by atheist101


16.   Apr 22, 2005 4:37 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: IFOMCAROTFLMAO* posted by Pinky102:

Nah. I didn't pray for them to leave. If anything I'd pray fo ...


-- posted by EvilChihuahua





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Joseph Newhard's Atheism topic, please visit the Discussions page.