|
|
|||
|
|
Epistemic issues were under debate for a very long time. The Ancient Greeks viewed modern labour and experimenting with disdain, and thus science did not progress beyond the most immediate practicality. Heron invented steam power in 50 CE. If progress had continued, we would have 1700 years of advance over our present technology. But Greek religion, and then Christian religion, both opposed the inquiry into natural causes, preferring to believe that the gods were the answer to all questions.
By the time of the Enlightenment, science had definitely proven that empiricism was the only method that produced permanent results, and could improve the human condition. Religion and alchemy had failed. We now know that everything is perceivable, material, measurable and predictable (at least at the macroscopic level - quantum physics is an issue that is beyond the scope of this article). Today there are still some people who obstinately refuse to acknowledge the power of natural law, despite the fact that they live in a scientific era that doubled their lifespan and opened more than half their lives to leisure - people who think that "pure logic" and imagination is better than the senses. These "modern alchemists", prehistoric cavemen in suits, are called Christians and pseudo-scientists. By this, I don't mean that there is nothing complicated about materialism. For instance, we know that some things exist without having perceived them, on the basis of its effects on other objects. We know that some planets exist without seeing them, simply by measuring the fluctuations in a sun's orbit. And we can do this because of the law of gravitation. The sun's orbit is observed, the sun is material, the law of gravitation is based on observed facts. Another argument sometimes used is people's belief that the mind is not material. But we now know that the brain is the mind, or at least that the mind completely depends on the brain. Brain damage has proven to us that the brain contains all the functions we attribute to the "mind", and damaging one area damages our capacity to use its functions. That alone is enough to disprove all the beliefs in "souls" and all these spooks in your head. There are no demons in your head, stop talking about this nonsense. Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article Our Place in the Universe (I) in Atheism is owned by . Permission to republish Our Place in the Universe (I) in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Francois Tremblay's Atheism topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||
|
|
|||