|
|
|||
|
|
Page 2
2. "the Bible has extraordinary attributes X and Y, therefore it is true".
The second type of argument tries to provide such justification, but all the attributes they list are known to be man-made.The Bible was assembled from books of all sorts of different eras, by partisan theology, based on arbitrary criteria. Why should we be surprised if the Bible presents consistency ? In fact, it is the lack of consistency in the Bible that is most striking Finally, presuppositional arguments are of the type : "Atheists/materialists cannot explain why they use X, therefore God exists". Some examples they give are logic, science (uniformity of nature) and morality. Against these examples, you can easily use TANG or Materialist Apologetics. In general, presuppositional arguments lack specificity, as we've seen before. But what I find in discussions is that asking a Christian to justify his presuppositionalism usually exposes him. As stupid as it sounds, most Christians who use presuppositional arguments simply assume that they are right. They have a Saturday Cartoon understanding of science or materialism, and routinely commit the Composition Fallacy ("chemicals can't think, therefore your brain can't think !"). Sound understanding of the four silver bullets should give you the upper hand over such shenanigans.
Go To Page: 1 2
The copyright of the article The Four Silver Bullets (II) - Page 2 in Atheism is owned by Francois Tremblay. Permission to republish The Four Silver Bullets (II) - Page 2 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Francois Tremblay's Atheism topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
||
|
|
|||