The Four Silver Bullets (I)


© Francois Tremblay

It probably comes as no surprise to anyone that there is a great number of theological arguments out there. If you are a neophyte, the amount of information needed in order to understand them may be daunting.

On the other hand, martial artists know that concentrating on the weak points of their enemies is far more efficient. Likewise, if you are an atheist interested in debating Christians but do not wish to spend a great deal of time learning each argument and counter-argument, these four "silver bullets" should serve you well against the classical arguments.

Classical arguments are those which seek to prove the existence of God from natural evidence. Most theists naturally use classical arguments when they try to prove the existence of God, but I will also give some tips for other kinds of arguments at the end of this article.



1. Special Pleading.

To commit Special Pleading is to exclude what we are trying to prove from a premise that would otherwise disprove it.

The most obvious example is the Cosmological Argument's premise that "everything that exists has a cause". Even if we accept the truth of this premise (which, as we will see with the next fallacy, we should not), we cannot conclude that God exists on its basis. Since God exists, it would also need a cause, therefore it could not be God. The premise "everything that exists has a cause" disproves the conclusion "God exists".

In answer to this fallacy, Christians will plead that their god is "special", hence the name of the fallacy. They will answer, for instance, that God is by definition uncaused. This is all well and good, but this only means that they must reject the premise "everything that exists has a cause" as self-contradictory and abandon their argument, or deny that God is part of "everything that exists", but this would simply make them atheists.

2. Composition Fallacy.

The Composition Fallacy is a complex fallacy, but can be expressed simply as transposing a property of parts on a whole without justification.

For example, bricks are parts of a wall. It is fairly clear that while "the bricks (parts) are yellow, therefore the wall (whole) is yellow" is sensible, the deduction "the bricks (parts) are old, therefore the wall (whole) is old" is not sensible. The bricks may be old but arranged into a wall just yesterday. Any property that is based on relations or arrangements between parts does not apply to the whole.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article The Four Silver Bullets (I) in Atheism is owned by . Permission to republish The Four Silver Bullets (I) in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

30.   Jul 16, 2005 9:28 AM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Clause one posted by Craig93:

What is your level of scientific trai ...


-- posted by atheist101


29.   Jul 15, 2005 2:32 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Clause one posted by atheist101:


G'day Atheist101

Christians ………… ...


-- posted by Craig93


28.   Jul 15, 2005 11:05 AM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Clause one posted by Craig93:

Are you saying that there are no Christian S ...


-- posted by atheist101


27.   Jul 14, 2005 1:33 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Clause one posted by atheist101:

G'day Atheist.

Are you saying that there are n ...


-- posted by Craig93


26.   Jul 14, 2005 12:09 PM
In response to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Clause one posted by _Boanerges_:

Atheist101... if you would review the thread discussi ...


-- posted by atheist101





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Francois Tremblay's Atheism topic, please visit the Discussions page.