Home » Mind & Soul » Atheism » The Seven Questions Creationists Cannot Answer (II) - Page 3

The Seven Questions Creationists Cannot Answer (II) - Page 3

© Francois Tremblay

As a recent study from the Annual Review of Microbiology put it :

From site-specific recombination to changes in polymerase fidelity and repair of DNA damage, an organism's gene products affect what genetic changes occur in its genome. Through the action of natural selection on these gene products, potentially favorable mutations can become more probable than random.. With examples from variation in bacterial surface proteins to the vertebrate immune response, it is clear that a great deal of genetic change is better than "random" with respect to its potential effect on survival. Indeed, some potentially useful mutations are so probable that they can be viewed as being encoded implicitly in the genome

("NATURAL SELECTION AND THE EMERGENCE OF A MUTATION PHENOTYPE: An Update of the Evolutionary Synthesis Considering Mechanisms that Affect Genome Variation", Annual Review of Microbiology, October 2003)

What is your opinion on the subject ? If you have issues you'd like to see featured here, email me. Don't hesitate to post on the message board - go back to the main page and scroll below the articles list, or if no thread on the subject is available yet, click on "Start a discussion on this article". Happy thinking !

The copyright of the article The Seven Questions Creationists Cannot Answer (II) - Page 3 in Atheism is owned by Francois Tremblay. Permission to republish The Seven Questions Creationists Cannot Answer (II) - Page 3 in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.