What does fighting for Atheism mean ? (I)
of it is exalted.
Schopenhauer and still much more Friedrich Nietzsche realizes that all those good Christian concepts (e.g., “love”, “charity”, “spiritual welfare”, “truths”, “morals”, “god”, “heaven” etc.) that imbecile and dumb ones may make believe in Christianity are nothing but the sheep's clothing of that wolf (Jesus Christ) those wolves (superior Christian priests). That means further that those nice terms and feigned attitudes of the Christians are parts of their insidiousness that never can be without a mask and probably never can be outdone by someone else.
To divert suspicion from that what he precisely is and is plotting, Jesus Christ always warns his victim of all evil apparitions, so that nobody shall think that he is one of that kind of evilness he continuously “good-heartily” is warning of. The evildoer has to appear as benefactor. That is why Jesus Christ knows that only a sheep's clothing can make the deceiver successful. As already said, Jesus Christ excellently masters those psychological projections. And last not least that is one of the reasons why Christian “theism” is that successful. In particular, the Christian Middle Ages provide evidence that Jesus Christ and the Christian indeed are wolves in a sheep's clothing or that a Satanic human being appears as “god's son” …
In contrast with those arguments on Christianity, many atheists feel comfortably by explaining that theism -- i.e., the imagination of an anthropomorphic god -- only is an imaginary continuation of the relationship of child and father etc. or, or that the founders of those sects (or religion) might have been mad ones. I do not believe that mad ones ever could do that success but insidious criminals or (religious) Mafiosi.
Not few atheists are even taken in by the Christians that god, heaven, doomsday and hell etc. are fairy tales but Christian “love” and “morals”, i.e. the Christians' sheep's clothing are good and even otherwise deem those monotheistic sects to be harmless. I remember that some German atheistic web pages wanted to compete with that ones of mine [iii] proposing my recognitions by the thesis that Jesus Christ was not insidious but lunatic. I side with Nietzsche, who correctly sees that this naïve and infantile imagination (of an anthropomorphic god) is abused by utmost unscrupulous criminals (felons) promoting the advantage of their own, i.e. enslaving their fellow human beings and lifting up themselves to slaveholders or
Latest Articles