Suite101

Special Relativity Down to Earth


© Wesley Colley
Page 2
be faster in your reference frame than on the train. Maybe the speed of light is slightly boosted.

  • If Einstein is correct, and the speed of light is indeed the same in both reference frames, then the longer (diagonal) paths we observe the light to follow would make the light clock on the train slow down from our vantage point, by just the amount required by the Pythagorean Theorem. So which is it? Do we observe the speed of light to change, or do we observe the clock to slow down. Well, as we all now know, Einstein (counter-intuitively) was right. The clock on the train slows down, and the speed of light remains constant. This slowing down of time is called time dilation, and is one of the more controversial physics discoveries of the century.

    Though this mirror contraption seems contrived, it's only the simplest example. In fact, all clocks slow down, mechanical, biological, and atomic. Why? Einstein also insisted that not only was the speed of light constant, but all laws of physics. Therefore the gears in the clock, the rhythm of your heart and the transition of atmoic nuclei obey the same principles as the light clock. This shouldn't be surprising because the basic physical forces which govern these common clocks also propagate at the speed of light, so exactly the same arugments would be relevant.

    That is why moving clocks slow down.

    Just one more example to bring the point home. Imagine you're at the center of a town with a large lighted clock tower. Facing the clock tower, you start running backward. As you run faster and faster, the second hand has to appear to move more slowly, because the light from the clock is having to catch up to you. By the time you're moving at very near the speed of light, the second hand nearly freezes, because the light from the clock tower is just barely catching up to you. In that case, it's obvious that the moving clock (relative to you) runs more slowly.

  • Go To Page: 1 2


    Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


    Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

    5.   Mar 3, 2001 4:10 PM
    Hi Wes,

    Good article on Special relativity. There is, however, something misleading about what you wrote. Your final paragraph tries to justify time dilation by using the example of the perso ...


    -- posted by plab


    4.   Dec 24, 2000 11:35 AM
    In response to message posted by Wes_Colley:

    just a short question. i've seen other explanations, but this is the best. is the beha ...


    -- posted by N321MM


    3.   Aug 17, 2000 1:45 PM
    What are the practical implications of this discovery? Does it have anything to do with the different dimensions Einstein was looking for? ...

    -- posted by Snead


    2.   Jul 17, 2000 12:58 PM
    I wrote this after a spate of annoying relativity abuses on TV...

    -- posted by Wes_Colley


    1.   Jul 10, 2000 8:50 AM
    Wow -- thanks! Your examples make this so much easier to understand.

    I'm a long time lurker here. I enjoy your articles very much.
    Christina ...


    -- posted by Tina_Coruth





    Join the latest discussions

    For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Wesley Colley's Astronomical Events topic, please visit the Discussions page.