Okay, so what's so grand about this idea. It sounds almost obvious, that any unaccelerated observer finds the speed of light to be the same as would any other unaccelerated observer. As easy as the idea sounds, it has bizarre consequences. Here is the most basic problem. Imagine you're observing a train passing by. On the train there is a clock which works by bouncing light pulses up and down between two mirrors. Let's imagine that the clock is three meters tall, so the light (travelling at 300,000,000 meters per second) strikes a mirror 100,000,000 times per second. So every 100,000,000 reflections is one second, and the clock merrily measures time in that very simple way. So, here comes the train toward you clicking off the seconds precisely. The problem is that because the train is travelling by you, you see the light bouncing along diagonal paths between the mirrors, not vertical paths as an observer on the train would see. If you were to diagram the path of the light, you would see something of a crown-shaped path, as this figure) illustrates. Up and down, but moving horizontally at the same time, the light ray would obviously move faster according to you, than according to someone on the train.
There are one of two possibilities then:
Go To Page: 1 2
| Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: | View all related messages |
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Wesley Colley's Astronomical Events topic, please visit the Discussions page.