Mountaintop Removal


© Greg Cruey

The dust is beginning to settle now, but all of West Virginia was shaken last month with a landmark federal court ruling which prohibited mountaintop coal operators from burying streams in the state.

Chief U.S. District Judge Charles H. Haden II ruled on Oct. 20 that the practice of filling stream valleys with mine waste was not allowed in streams that flow year-round or part of the year.

"When valley fills are permitted in intermittent and perennial streams, they destroy those stream segments," Haden's 49-page ruling said.

"The normal flow and gradient of the stream is now buried under millions of cubic yards of excess spoil waste material, an extremely adverse effect," the judge said.

"If there are fish, they cannot migrate. If there is any life form that cannot acclimate to life deep in a rubble pile, it is eliminated," he said. "No effect on related environmental values is more adverse than obliteration."

"Under a valley fill, the water quality of the stream becomes zero," he wrote. "Because there is no stream, there is no water quality."

Haden ordered the West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection (DEP) not to issue any more permits that allowed valley fills in perennial and intermittent streams.


"October 20, 1999, will go down as the bleakest day in the recent history of our state of West Virginia," WV Governor Cecil Underwood told reporters concerning the court ruling.

Two days after the ruling Underwood ordered a halt, not only to new permits, but to continued filling of perennial and intermittent streams under previously approved permits. Ben Greene, president of the West Virginia Mining and Reclamation Association, said order could shut down the majority of the state's mines. Mining in WV employs about 16,000 people currently, according to the Bureau of Employment Programs.

United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts issued a short statement saying that he was "deeply disappointed by Judge Haden's ruling."

"The negative economic implications of this ruling to every West Virginian working in the state's coal industry today are really troublesome to say the least," Roberts said.

Roberts said that UMW lawyers will join DEP's efforts to appeal the ruling.

Economically, the ruling could hit WV hard - nearly $32 million in lost taxes, primarily from a $21 million decline in coal severance taxes are expected. The decrease in mining and mining-related employment could also reduce personal income tax revenue by around $5 million and sales taxes by around $4.5 million. Another $1.5 million could be lost by the state in business tax.

Go To Page: 1 2 3


The copyright of the article Mountaintop Removal in Appalachia is owned by . Permission to republish Mountaintop Removal in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

2.   Nov 25, 1999 4:07 AM
Hi Christina,

Sorry it took me so long to get around to answering this.

Coal in the Central Appalachian region has been on the decline since at least the mid 1980's. I live in Virginia; but I'm ...


-- posted by GKCruey


1.   Nov 6, 1999 6:48 AM
What a dilemma! This is a fascinating article, Greg. I thought that dumping into streams was prohibited already by EPA regulations. This was an eye opener. Yet the thought of wreaking such havoc on th ...

-- posted by Tina_Coruth





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Greg Cruey's Appalachia topic, please visit the Discussions page.