Home » History » Ancient British History » Where is Arthur? Camlann and Beyond

Where is Arthur? Camlann and Beyond

©

In all of this talk of the Heptarchy and the ascendancy of the Roman Church, we have seen precious little of the Welsh and Scots and, most especially, of Arthur. Where is he? Why is he not mentioned in writings of the time?

The primary reason he is not listed in Anglo-Saxon writings of the time is that the Angles and Saxons didn't write much down. This has been seen earlier. The people who were writing things down at this point in time were the monks and others in the Christian Church, and not a whole lot of them wanted to have anything to do with the Arthur story in the first place. They were far too busy selling their religion to worry about what could be construed as another cult.

Arthur, it will be remembered, set the Saxon invasions back a generation with his smashing victory at the Battle of Badon Hill. After that, the years fade into obscurity until we hear of him again at Camlann.

This, of course, is Arthur's last battle, at which he is supposed to have been mortally wounded. The Annales Cambriae, or Annals of Wales, say this happened in 539. This dating is most curious given the fact that no place is listed. Still, it fits in with the general chronology that dates Badon Hill to anywhere from 480 to 520. The Annales Cambriae say of Camlann that it was the place "where Arthur and Medraut fell."

Now, the word "fell" is usually taken to mean "died," especially when being read in the context of a battle. Yet, we have Geoffrey of Monmouth centuries later talking about Arthur's being taken to the Isle of Avalon for rehabilitation or whatever. Geoffrey, it seems, didn't believe that Arthur died at Camlann. We also see in Geoffrey the idea that Medraut (whom Geoffrey calls Mordred, the first use of this name) had a hand in Arthur's death, perhaps even being the instrument.

But where was Camlann? No one knows. Was it on the River Cam, which runs near Cadbury, thought to have been Camelot? Was it the River Camel, in Cornwall? What of the word itself? Camlann is a Welsh derivation of Camboglanna, which means "crooked bank." As such, it could be anywhere. A fort along Hadrian's Wall has the Roman name of Camboglanna. Could this be Camlann? If so, it means that Arthur fought his last battle far to the north of what is supposed to have been his kingdom. (There are, of course, a host of historians who believe that Arthur was exclusively a northern figure.)

The copyright of the article Where is Arthur? Camlann and Beyond in Ancient British History is owned by . Permission to republish Where is Arthur? Camlann and Beyond in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.