|
|
||||||||
|
|
The bulk of international attention on monolithic rings is often focused on Stonehenge; but to many people, the rings at Avebury are far more impressive, if much more unknown.
The ingenuity is still on display for all to see, however, since it is much more difficult to level a massive bank and ditch than it is to (re)move smaller stones-although that process must have been impressive as well. The most impressive, however, had to have been the process of getting those stones in the circles in the first place. Dating tests suggest that the stones were placed there about 4,500 years ago (making this stone circle older than Stonehenge). The stones themselves are between 9 and 20 feet tall, with the largest of them weighing 40 tons. Made of bedrock, they were hewn from rock at a quarry two miles away and then dragged to the site and slammed into the ground, at depths of between 6 and 24 inches. Archaeologists similarly estimate that the creation of the ditch must have necessitated the carving up and carrying away of the equivalent of 200,000 tons of rock. (Remember, too, that all those years ago, the people who lived there had only the most primitive of stone tools.) Such enterprises must have taken many years to complete. One just then ask the question of purpose. Why did these people do this? Was it a meeting place? Is the placement of the entrances on the compass point lines a coincidence? Was Avebury a place for astronomical observation, as many people now believe Stonehenge was?
Go To Page: 1 2
For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to David White's Ancient British History topic, please visit the Discussions page. |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||