Suite101

Causes of the Civil War: The Northwest Ordinance (1787) and the U.S. Constitution


© Michael J. Swogger

In the introduction I stated that slavery was not necessarily the direct cause of the Civil War, nor was the War fought to end or preserve that institution. The question of slavery can be found, however, as a basis of many other issues that arose prior to the War. Thus, to ignore slavery and how the issue was addressed in the late 1700's would be unjust when the time comes to examine the controversial issues and events that occurred during the mid 1800's.

Following the American victory over the British in the American Revolution, the issue of slavery and the question of whether it was an economic necessity and ethical institution surfaced in full force in the colonies, particularly in the North. Before the end of the War in 1780, Pennsylvania made provisions for the gradual abolition of slavery, and many states were soon to follow suit. Between the years 1783 and 1786 most northern states took steps to manumit all slaves in their respective states. Even some southern states looked for indirect ways to encourage slave owners to free their servants. In 1787, Congress passed the Northwest Land Ordinance that included a provision that outlawed slavery in the new territories located in present-day Ohio, Michigan, Indiana and Illinois. This was the first official act of Congress that brought the issue of slavery to the national political scene.

The founding fathers had to deal with slavery when writing the Constitution. If you look carefully into this great but fallible document, the word "slave" never appears. However, the issue was dealt with on three separate areas of concern: representation, international slave trade and fugitive slaves. To address the representation dilemma, the writers included a 3/5 clause in which slaves, or "all other persons" are included. Thus slaves were not thought to be a whole person, just 3/5 of one. Secondly, the founders banned the "migration or importation of such persons," an act that would take effect on January 1, 1808. Finally, all runaway slaves were declared property "of the party to whom such service or labour may be due," and that any slave that escaped to a free territory or state was bound to return to his or her owner.

So as you can see, the founding fathers of the United States addressed the issue of slavery as politely as possible. With the signing of the U.S. Constitution, slavery was a state-supported and sanctioned institution, and because of this fact the Civil War was almost made inevitable by the founders in 1787.

Go To Page: 1 2


The copyright of the article Causes of the Civil War: The Northwest Ordinance (1787) and the U.S. Constitution in American Civil War is owned by . Permission to republish Causes of the Civil War: The Northwest Ordinance (1787) and the U.S. Constitution in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

11.   May 16, 2001 9:19 AM
Wrap10? Do you work at Taco Bell? Are you mexican? I think Latino's are pretty. Thank you!

-- posted by notavoter


10.   Dec 30, 1999 9:18 PM
Brian,

Perhaps he was referring to the Missouri Compromise.

Actually no, he used the term 'Southwest Ordinance,' and spoke of it during a segment that discussed the NWO. At least that's ...


-- posted by Wrap10


9.   Dec 30, 1999 9:13 PM
Mug,

Same here. I'll have to check into it at some point, since like you it's got my curiosity up.
Hope you have a good New Year.

Perry ...


-- posted by Wrap10


8.   Dec 21, 1999 7:03 AM
Perhaps he was referring to the Missouri Compromise.

-- posted by BrianTubbs


7.   Dec 20, 1999 9:49 AM
Michael, I agree with John on this. The issue of the 3/5 compromise was purely one of representation. The framers of the Constitution were ironing out the best compromise the various sides would agr ...

-- posted by BrianTubbs





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael J. Swogger's American Civil War topic, please visit the Discussions page.