Ewell At Gettysburg (Part II)


© Michael J. Swogger

Could the Confederates have taken Cemetery Hill on that late afternoon of July 1? Ewell's division commander, Jubal Early, and a self-assigned aide, Isaac Trimble, seemed to believe they could. Early conferred with Ewell several times about the Union position on the heights, and both times he concluded that taking the hill was of the utmost and critical importance to the Southern armies. Trimble, too, saw the possibilities here. He argued and pleaded with Ewell to allow him to take a good brigade (and even regiment) so he could take the hill.

General Lee, who arrived on the battlefield around 4pm, was at first upset that a fight had begun without his army being fully concentrated. When he saw the advantage his forces had gained, however, his mood quickly changed. He sent his own staff officer to find General Ewell and verbally issue him the order to take Cemetery Hill "if practicable." At the same time Lee's major was riding to Ewell, a rider send by Ewell was delivering a message to Lee telling him that Ewell, if he was to attack the heights (something Ewell knew was important), he would need support from A.P. Hill's corps. Lee replied, saying that Hill's men were much too weary to continue the fight. Ewell, if he was to attack, would have to do it alone.

As the first message from Lee arrived, Ewell was puzzled by Lee's verbal order that left much discretion to the II Corps commander. He was still under the order not to cause a general engagement, for Lee reiterated that order after the "if practicable" message was received. Staring up at the heavily fortified Union position on the hill, Ewell received the second message from Lee concerning Hill's corps. As the night was growing nearer, and the bulk of his men tired from the day's fighting, Ewell decided not to attack, thus creating one of the biggest controversies of the Civil War.

Was Ewell right in not attacking, or did he act insubordinately? What were the reasons behind his decision? Did he ultimately lose the Battle of Gettysburg? These are questions that will be explored in part III of "Ewell At Gettysburg" Until then, what do you think?

To be continued soon

Go To Page: 1


The copyright of the article Ewell At Gettysburg (Part II) in American Civil War is owned by . Permission to republish Ewell At Gettysburg (Part II) in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

2.   May 12, 1998 4:37 PM
james birnie
hindsight being 20/20 we now know that a attack was required to save the south . The chances of winning the attack is moot because we know that without the attack the southern cause is ...

-- posted by jamesb_15


1.   Aug 16, 1997 10:03 AM
Doesn't anyone have anything to say about Ewell? Or is it that no one's actually reading this article?

Mike Swogger,

Contributing Editor,

American Civil War
...


-- posted by mswogger





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Michael J. Swogger's American Civil War topic, please visit the Discussions page.