Converting a Savage Mind: Abstract Faith and Literal Savage


© Jessica Powers
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic

Those who felt the missionary endeavor had achieved little often based this conclusion on a preconceived idea that Christianity was too "abstract" or "sublime" to be understood by a literal and savage African mind. The categories of abstract/literal fit neatly into the binary opposition of English/"other" and Christian/Savage. The African, perceived as a literal, sensual creature, culturally opposed to the English, could never switch categories.

Obviously, there were differences between the attributes of "Christianity" according to explorers, traders, writers and many others and its attributes according to missionaries. For Sydney Smith, Methodism - the fervor of evangelical zeal - only produced "evil fanaticism" rather than "rational religion"( Smith, "Review," 40). Like Charles Dickens, he concluded that those in the ministry who were rational found enough to do at home (Smith, "Publications," 179).

The explorer W. Winwood Reade charged that the average missionary was so badly educated as to not know more than an eight year old child (Reade, 439). He mocked Mr. Rooke, a missionary he encountered in the Gambia, who refused hot meat on Sunday but committed gluttony with biscuits and cheese. His ungrammatical utterances, "ungentlemanly" sermons, and lack of knowledge about Islam caused Reade no end of disgust. On one occasion, he asked Rooke what he thought of Calvin. Rooke replied that he had met Mr. Calvin in London and "liked him very well" (Reade, 331). Considering the fact that Calvin espoused one of the most cherished theologies of Victorian Christianity - that of the elect - Rooke's ignorance placed him in a religious category too comparable to African savagery to earn Reade's respect. "No man can gain influence over negroes unless he can gain their respect," he stated, "and they are quite shrewd enough to detect such palpable ignorance"(Reade, 439).

The hierarchical notion of Christianity relegated certain denominations or movements as only a little higher than African "superstition." The hierarchy was one more way to stress that Africans were at the bottom of the pyramid; but missionaries, who tended to be "fanatical," were certainly not close to the top.

However, missionaries saw their brand of Christianity in a better light than their critics. They, too, compared it with African superstition and declared it to be intellectually superior. In his work Researches in South Africa, published in 1828, the Reverend John Philip, director of the London Missionary Society in South Africa, included a defense of Christianity over African beliefs. He attributed all African superstitious beliefs to "ignorance." When causes were unknown, he argued, people substituted a religious belief or practice to explain it. This caused superstition. However, superstition had the potential to grow into or progress into religion (Chidester, 89-90).

Go To Page: 1 2 3


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo