Converting a Savage Mind: Conversion and Civilization


© Jessica Powers
Articles in this Topic    Discussions in this Topic
Page 7

To Blyden, Taylor, Dickens, and Smith, conversion and civilization were not about the individual and his/her change. They were concerned about changing the entire African culture to become exactly like England. In this view, the process of civilization would take generations before it became reality. Some British officials questioned the idea that over long periods of time, Christianity would take root and effect change. In 1842, an inquiry into British settlements and missionary activity stated that little had been accomplished in changing African culture, morality, or religion. Dr. Richard Robert Madden, one of the key figures in the inquiry, told the Select Committee that the British settlements had "not proved instrumental to the promotion of the civilisation [sic] of Africa." The pagan customs were very much in place, despite the work of the missionaries. He would not say that there was no progress, but not the progress there should be compared to the degree of effort that the Government had made. When a member of the committee questioned whether the pagan customs would stop unless the Africans converted, he replied no, but said, "I think we might have expected, after the length of time for which we have had establishments there, that religion would have made advances to stop that" (Dr. Richard Robert Madden to the Select Committee on West Coast of Africa, 18 July 1842, British Parliamentary Papers, Colonies Africa vol. 2 (Shannon, Ireland: Irish University Press, 1970), 638-640).

Other officials and missionaries questioned by the Select Committee concurred with Dr. Madden's conclusions. Mr. James Peters told the committee that he went to church in Sierra Leone and saw few people present (Mr. James Peters to the Select Committee on West Cost of Africa, 17 June 1842, ibid., 361). D. Coates, secretary for the Church Missionary Society, quoted a letter from Governor Col. Findlay of Sierra Leone, who said that the public at home were led to believe that there were a large number of missionaries successfully carrying out the work of civilization, but the truth was that "not one-third of the population of this colony receive any instruction or derive the slightest benefit from the Church Missionary Society....[Sierra Leone] still remains in a state of barbarism, not withstanding the great exertions of the missionaries..." (D. Coates, Lay Secretary for the Church Missionary Society to Gov. Col. Findlay, 31 Jan. 1832, ibid., 392.)

During the inquiry, Coates protested the truth of that letter, stating facts to the contrary. Out of a population of 40,000, he argued, 6,000 were educated in the schools and 6,000 attended public worship. These statistics provided ample ammunition for Coates to rebut Governor Findlay's accusation and state that they afforded "very decisive proof as to the progress and efficiency of the Mission" (D. Coates, 395). But did that actually equal 12,000 out of 40,000? From Coates' ambiguous statement, some of the first 6,000 could be counted in the second 6,000. Although there were many who agreed with Coates, it did not change the perception of those who felt that the missionaries' work had achieved little. After all, what was the population of Sierra Leone (populated mostly with freed slaves) as compared to the multitudes of "savage natives" in the interior?

Go To Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo