Suite101

Review: JP3: Dino Defender


© Dan Finkelstein

With the release of "JP3: Dino Defender", Knowledge Adventure has done what many thought to be impossible: Create game based on the Jurassic Park movie license that is actually worse than 1998's horrid "Jurassic Park: Trespasser". Amazingly enough, while that game suffered from an overwhelmingly-long development period, huge amounts of hype, continual delays, and accusations of being "vaporware", then finally a game which was bascially unplayable (super-buggy graphics engine, laughable enemy AI, and an un-usable interface), Knowledge Adventure's "Dino Defender" manages to surpass even "Trespasser" for out-and-out crappiness.

Produced in secrecy behind "Edutainment" publisher Knowledge Adventure's doors, "Dino Defender" is a game which was announced only a few months ago -- and seemingly made in that time frame. The game plays as if it was made by a design and programming team of one with a basic knowledge of Macromedia Director: controls are unresponsive, gameplay is virtually nonexistant, and the graphics seem ripped from a SNES game (And honestly: I'm being kind here).

Adding to Knowledge Adventure's crimes with "Dino Defender" is false-advertising as well. The box promises "intense 3D worlds". What you get when you boot it up, however, is a side-scrolling "adventure" with flat, 2D graphics. Super Mario Brothers was more 3D than this game.

As for the game itself, it is bascially a standard 2D side-scrolling adventure game -- and a poor one at that. You play a strange silver robot character, who walks from screen to screen (screen scrolling was obviously too difficult a programming challange) gathering items and looking for secrets. Controls are so poor, however, that even this a chore. You can only perform one action at a time, so something as simple as jumping over a "cliff" is an exercise in frustration.

In all seriousness, it is simply amazing that "JP3: Dino Defender" made it to store shelves. Obviously no one at Knowledge Adventure cares about producing quality products, and instead are fine with releasing a half-baked (or perhaps "not-baked" would be better for "Dino Defender") product to correlate with a major motion picture in a vain attempt to rack in the cash.

"Dino Defender", is by far, one of the worst "games" I have played in the last several years. It is an insult to the customer and to the Jurassic Park franchise.

Go To Page: 1


The copyright of the article Review: JP3: Dino Defender in Computer Gaming is owned by . Permission to republish Review: JP3: Dino Defender in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo


Here's the follow-up discussion on this article: View all related messages

3.   Jan 16, 2006 6:41 PM
Well if the game sucks so bad (My brother LOVES it I like it but yeah they need to patch it for updates!!) Then they should patch it with better 3D graphics like they did 4 jedi knight: Jedi Acadamey ...

-- posted by DinoDog


2.   Sep 23, 2001 12:36 AM
In response to message posted by Usagi:

Okay, you're really getting on my nerves with this trashing on Dan. He reviews computer ...


-- posted by Wolvie27


1.   Sep 21, 2001 2:31 PM
My children have this game and they cannot stop playing it. They love it. Maybe you should stop shopping for kids' software if you don't like it. ...

-- posted by Usagi





For a complete listing of article comments, questions, and other discussions related to Dan Finkelstein's Computer Gaming topic, please visit the Discussions page.